Preview

BRICS Law Journal

Advanced search

The Construction of an Assessment Index System of Law-Based Governance of a City in China

https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2022-9-4-21-40

Abstract

Constructing an assessment index system of law-based governance of a city provides a data basis and an empirical basis for China’s urban construction of the rule of law and highlights its characteristics in the era of big data. A thorough understanding of the theory of the rule of law is required in order to establish this index system. The establishment of the index system needs to be based on a deep understanding of the theory of the rule of law. In particular, it is important to understand the relationship between the core content of the rule of law and the law-based governance of a city, and then to determine the connotation of law-based governance of a city. This serves as the starting point for constructing the index system. At the same time, it is necessary to have a solid grasp of the index theory, adhere to the method of index setting, break down the concept of law-based governance of a city into different levels of indicators according to the types and attributes of the indicators and continue to visualize and operationalize them until the content can be measured. As a whole, this forms a complete assessment index system. Of course, the content of the index system is not fixed and needs to be constantly tested and adjusted in practice.

About the Authors

Ze Li
Shanghai University of Political Science and Law
China

Associate Professor, School of Law



N. Symaniuk
Ural Federal University
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, Department of Theory, Methodology and Legal Support of Public and Municipal Administration, Graduate School of Economics and Management



References

1. Hongdao Q. et al. Assessment of the Rule of Law and its Application in China, 4 Chinese Social Science (2012).

2. Hongdao Q. et al. Experiments in the Evaluation of the Rule of Law – The Case of Yuhang (2012).

3. Hongdao Q. The Practice of Evaluation of the Rule of Law – The Case of Yuhang (2012).

4. Newman W.L. & Kreuger L.W. Social Work Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Applications (Liu Meng trans., 2008).

5. Sberg T.K. Misunderstandings in the Measurement of the Rule of Law (Yan Xingjian comp.), 2 Learning and Exploration (2016).

6. Shangjun Zh. & Yugen W. Theoretical Reflection and Prospect of the Evaluation of the Rule of Law Index, 3 Journal of Guangzhou University (2015).

7. Tao M. Rule of Law Assessment and Rule of Law Big Data (2020).

8. Wei Zh. Basic Constitutional Rights: Principles. Norms. Application (2006).

9. Xiaolin W. & Yujia H. The “Double Evolution” and Integration Trend of Urban Governance Theory, 1 Tianjin Social Sciences (2017).

10. Xinbao Zh. From Privacy to Personal Information: Theory and Institutional Arrangements for Re-evaluation of Interests, 3 China Law Journal (2015).

11. Yefeng W. The Concept, Role and Abstraction of Statistical Indicators, 5 Jinan Journal (2012).

12. Yubo B. On the Concept of Governing the City Under the Rule of Law, 6 China Judicial (2004).


Review

For citations:


Li Z., Symaniuk N. The Construction of an Assessment Index System of Law-Based Governance of a City in China. BRICS Law Journal. 2022;9(4):21-40. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2022-9-4-21-40

Views: 818


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2409-9058 (Print)
ISSN 2412-2343 (Online)